Skip to content

Atoms, Institutions, Blockchains

TalkJosh Stark
researcherpractitioner
Atoms, Institutions, Blockchains
Open resource →

Josh Stark of the Ethereum Foundation presents his 'hardness' framework, arguing that atoms, institutions, and blockchains are three distinct sources that make future outcomes predictable enough to enable human social coordination, resolving the apparent contradiction between blockchains being 'trustless' (no reliance on institutional hardness) and 'trustworthy' (they possess their own hardness). He introduces the term 'cast' for the specific outcome being hardened, analyzes the comparative strengths and weaknesses of each hardness source, and closes with open questions about whether protocols constitute a fourth category or sit inside/across the other three. The talk is followed by discussion with Trent, Juan, Seth, Gordon, and Dorian probing how to measure, discover, and red-team hardness.

Topics

atomsinstitutionsblockchains-frameworkcastguest-talkshardnessorganizationsprogrammable-hardnessprotocolstechnologytrust-experience

Related resources

Interview

Bridge Atlas - Episode 2: Paradigms | Nils Gilman and Josh Stark

Nils Gilman (Berggruen Institute) and Josh Stark (Ethereum Foundation) discuss two concepts they each coined: 'planetary thinking' (governance of non-human-directed flows like carbon, whales, and space debris) and 'hardness' (a system's capacity to make future outcomes reliably true, distinct from subjective trust or reliance). They explore how hardness explains Ethereum's appeal amid declining institutional trust, distinguish hardness from trust using examples like universities versus Harvard's reputation, and discuss Ethereum's potential role in planetary-scale coordination through projects like Rarimo's Freedom Tool and Bhutan's national ID system.

Nils Gilman, Josh Stark

Talk

Guest Talk with Evan Miyazono | Putting Protocols into Practice

Evan Miyazono, head of research at Protocol Labs, walks through his mechanism-design approach to protocols—mapping rules to strategies to outcomes—using Filecoin's proof-of-replication and the late addition of Filecoin Plus (a trust layer to prevent 'useless bit' storage attacks) as a case study. He then surveys Protocol Labs' public-goods funding experiments (hypercerts, retroactive funding, the S-process for preference aggregation, Funding the Commons conferences) and closes with speculative thoughts on open agency architecture for AI alignment as a future protocol challenge.

Evan Miyazono

Talk

Guest Talk with Alex Komoroske | Gardening Platforms

Alex Komoroske, drawing on his experience leading Chrome's web platform team, argues that platforms should be 'gardened' rather than engineered: built incrementally and horizontally from adjacent possible use cases rather than vertically toward a single predetermined goal, with continuous 'rationalization' to pay down the debt that inevitably accumulates as platform and ecosystem co-evolve. He frames platforms and their ecosystems as living, symbiotic systems bound by a 'gravitational pull' that breaks if changes move too fast, and discusses how platforms die through ossification, rising coordination costs, or failed 'second system' rewrites. In Q&A he extends the framework to crypto protocols, corporate digital transformation, and security-by-design, debating with Toby Shorin and others how legal/organizational fragmentation changes platform dynamics in permissionless networks like Ethereum, Cosmos, and Solana.

Alex Komoroske